‘What we do flows from who we are’
~ Paul Vitale

The creator of Metamorpheus is an artist and writer from the United Kingdom. This website is dedicated to his research, and its central aim is to provide other truthseekers with the broadest possible perspective on spiritual and conspiratorial principles. This means venturing into topics of an often unconsidered and controversial nature, even by esoteric standards. It is a solitary project, unfunded and part-time, but serves to satisfy its author’s spirited desire to contribute to a research community that brought him so much knowledge and thus, by extension, awareness.

Below are some questions which have been asked concerning this site and its information:

 

1.) Why did you create this website?

I created Metamorpheus to assist those who follow a similar path to me, and to give back to a community of researchers that has expanded my knowledge immeasurably over the last few years.

Although I discovered esoteric knowledge in 2006, I refrained from publishing my findings online until 2009. Why? Because I understood, from the beginning, that this information – which bears implications of such immensity – requires maturation through discernment before distribution. I simply didn’t want to spread unripe ideas, unsubstantial conjectures or downright misinformation. Today, however, I have had time to explore and meditate on many perspectives and accounts, and this website’s information is a distillation of what resonates strongest with me.

Metamorpheus is also a vessel through which I can better crystallise my own beliefs. From my experience, articulating one’s beliefs into writing is the greatest way of arraying your jigsaw pieces and assembling the puzzle in a collected, reliable and structured manner. Reliance upon mental contemplation alone is unwise, for our memories are fallible; they struggle to visualise the totality of our findings and the breadth of our conclusions. They are also seldom able to retrieve data in a prompt and accurate fashion, which is troublesome for a research community whose detractors foremost heed the opportunity to question evidence (or lack thereof). Thus, I believe that writing this website helps me as much as it – hopefully – helps others.

2.) Why did you name it ‘Metamorpheus’?

I chose to entitle this website ‘Metamorpheus’ because it functions as a portmanteau of the words ‘metaphysics’ and ‘Morpheus,’ two nouns related to the themes discussed herein (the global conspiracy I explore is partially unveiled, albeit in symbolic form, by the Morpheus character in The Matrix). Furthermore, the word has superficial phonetic and semantic similarities to ‘metamorphosis’, which is an appropriate term for the energetic shift currently impacting Earth.

However, I cannot take credit for coining the word. Metamorpheus is the name of Steve Hackett’s classical guitar album of 2005 (which chronicles Orpheus’s descent into the underworld), although I can trace the word back as early as 2000, so evidently Hackett did not coin it either. It seems its origin will remain unknown.

3.) Why does this website have a considerably greater focus on metaphysics than conspiracy?

Although all forms of knowledge are important, I believe that conspiracy research is less important than metaphysical research. When researchers focus on oneness and our placement within this illusory game, they not only view the forest from the trees, but the macrocosm from the forest. By comparison, those who focus exclusively on the worldly conspiracy not only overlook the forest, but, due to the undefined and misdirecting nature of their field, are seldom able to determine whether the few trees they can see are redwoods, oaks, elms, or holograms.

I am not saying that conspiracy research is an unworthy pursuit, and that those who attend to its calling are mistaken; contrariwise, it is a noble and increasingly necessary work, and I admire the courage of whistleblowers who risk life for conscience. But the ground on which we tread is not physical, and absolute truths are not entombed in governmental drawers. If we cannot at least frame the conspiracy with a metaphysical basis, then our conclusions will seriously lack coordination.

4.) What is your opinion on disinformation?

I do not doubt that disinformation (deliberate misinformation) saturates our research arena, and that it is a multi-levelled operation. However, I also believe that the number of conscious, government-funded or Family-trained disinformants pales compared to the number of unconscious misinformants who have been mind-controlled, electromagnetically influenced, or simply misled by coordinated forces. For instance, I believe David Icke to be a genuine researcher, but I also believe that suspicious characters like Credo Mutwa and Arizona Wilder have unintentionally misled him. (Many researchers like Icke are wanderers who incarnated on Earth from comparatively harmonious and altruistic densities, and thus lack discernment and understanding of manipulation). Furthermore, I believe that there are several well-known researchers who, despite legitimately opposing the New World Order, have allegiances elsewhere that compromise their objectivity. Of course, the messenger is secondary to the message; embrace what resonates and discard all else.

Personally, I am more vigilant of disinformation sourced by fourth and fifth density negative entities. Although such misdirection is sometimes wreaked upon those solely concerned with worldly corruption, this more sophisticated treatment is usually reserved for those (such as lightworkers) who seek to explore and expose the bigger picture. Common strategies that such entities employ include the artificial induction of intuitive resonations, externally-sourced thought influence and memory implants, introducing mind-controlled agents into one’s life with the intention of misdirection, and – most frequently – psychically attacking you so that you lack the energy, and thus the motivation, to continue your work. While this might sound like a baneful list, knowledge of such tactics is the first requisite for self-defence. From knowledge do solutions, researched or self-comprehended, spring naturally. For instance, while the concept of artificially-induced intuitive resonations might horrify an inexperienced researcher, who then surmises that you cannot trust even yourself, he may learn that artificial resonations are more awkward than legitimate higher guidance (the former tends to lack the warmth and conviction of the latter). Thus, such chicanery will seldom mislead him again.

Always recall the bigger picture when contemplating such issues. While many people understandably consider disinformants to be the scourge of the conspiracy sphere, their work – regardless of whether they intend it to or not – helps you to scrutinise your own beliefs and, in consequence, cultivate a higher regard for the truth. Against a black background, the brilliance of white is ever stronger.

Third density is the density of choice, and we will be tested on our path. Just as choosing to serve others is the practical manifestation of truth and cannot exist without ‘the other’ (self-service), so authentic information is the theoretical manifestation of truth and cannot exist without ‘the other’ (what we term ‘lies’). Can we truly dislike those who actually reinforce, albeit through unconventional and often unwilled means, the way ahead?

5.) I am disturbed by your belief that the Family/Illuminati consciously or unconsciously help humanity. How can evil help souls who are actively seeking positivity?

When a negative entity (or a group of negative entities) harms you, they provide you with a catalyst that may assist you with one or more of the following:

1.) They can help you clear ‘negative’ karma by providing a ‘negative’ event through which a valuable lesson can be learned. Naturally, the event’s occurrence alone does not automatically remove the karma, just as simply attending an examination does not result in an automatic pass. If the persona fails to learn from the event, then the event may repeat until he does. Karmic law is borne from a desire to teach, not punish.

2.) They allow you to determine, or redetermine, your choice of orientation. The ‘negative’ event will help those who have polarised to affirm their respective choices, and help those who have not polarised (most of humanity at present) to do so.

3.) They help you complete your lifeplan, for their personas are enacting what your soul told their souls to do before incarnation. In this density, wherein STS and STO coexist simultaneously, all lifeplans contain ‘negative’ events for reasons summarised in points one and two. Often, the personas who commit personal crimes against us are soul mates or soul friends, and all participating parties consent to such events before incarnation. If your lifeplan didn’t intend a negative event, then you probably manifested it through negative thought. (It is difficult to discriminate between destined and manifested events, although the former tend to feel more ‘significant’ and even contrived [insofar as its preceding challenges often ‘prepare’ you for its occurrence], whereas the latter usually assume a more impulsive quality, and bear consequences of lesser scope).

When a truthseeker begins to transcend basic intellectual understanding and starts to really know, deep within, that these points are true, hatred or dislike for all facets of negativity gradually dissipate. Why squander energy wishing destruction on those who choose to destroy? Surely the only understanding one might acquire from such a mentality is the subtlety of irony. That said, for those who regularly resent their oppressors (and we all do at times), consider the following:

1.) ‘What comes around goes around.’ In other words, the negativity that a STS entity inflicts upon another being will eventually return to him – in this life or the next – because of karmic law. It is impossible for negative entities to transgress karma, and no-one ‘gets away’ with anything. Therefore, what is the point in hating them?

2.) No-one following the self-serving path is happy, and so long as they follow it they will never be happy. The misery that negative entities inflict upon you and/or your loved ones will always pale compared to the self-misery that they will endure for potentially billions of years. Therefore, what is the point in hating them?

3.) The minority who suffer the STS path help to show the majority who savour the STO path how to ‘win’ the game by being living examples of how to ‘lose’ the game. The game would be stagnant (indeed unwinnable) if its players misunderstood the goal, and self-serving entities unwittingly help us to comprehend and then achieve this goal. Therefore, what is the point in hating them?

6.) But surely such an outlook excuses evil and injustice?

No, not at all. I do not know a single person who, in truly understanding this perspective, descends into cosmic apathy or becomes an apologist for the Illuminati/Family. Embracing the concept of oneness is an important step towards STO, and the desire to battle injustice becomes an increasingly natural response to those who truly choose this path. It is not coincidental, nor paradoxical, that wanderers (who typically understand the concept of oneness and the significance of STS) are also nicknamed ‘system busters’ insofar as they seek to undermine corruption and oppose fascism, and instead sow seeds that will bear wiser fruit.

Interestingly, common worldly understandings of ‘not letting evil get away with it’ often result in evil ‘getting away’ with more than it originally intended. For example, while reciprocating fisticuffs with a pub drunk might appear a valid or even desirable solution for many incarnates, one who understands the game knows that such a choice not only fuels the event with additional venom – thus ensuring that the victim becomes karmically involved – but that it also enkindles a prolonged resentment within the victim for his attacker, which may yield additional manifestations of similar events. The victim has unknowingly transformed a transient blunder into an ongoing ordeal whose influence may outlast his current lifetime. This will not happen, of course, if he approaches the situation peaceably, and either pacifies the attacker, walks away, or chooses a similarly non-violent approach. Those who understand the ‘bigger picture’ recognise the futility of the ‘fight fire with fire’ mentality, and instead propose solutions that deflect the perpetuation of associated harm.

7.) Would it be wise to tell a victim of negativity (whether it be petty or extreme) that their experience was ‘part of a game’?

No, I don’t think it would be wise (or compassionate for that matter) to say that. When comforting someone who has experienced, or continues to experience, extreme negativity, I recommend conforming to their beliefs and framing all consolations within that foundation. Their vulnerable and/or traumatised state would probably reject these initially impractical and unhelpful explanations and solutions. I would even refrain from introducing metaphysical consolations to victims who are aware of this material, unless I were certain that they possessed enough understanding of, and conviction in, it for it to offer genuine comfort and context. I recommend assessing the situation sensitively, and offering advice relative to its circumstances.

8.) Do you believe that, in accordance with the Law of Attraction, those who dwell upon the global conspiracy also assist its manifestation?

That depends on whether negative emotional investment also accompanies such focus. If one researches the conspiracy with detachment, rationality, and temperance, and resists the subtle and often addictive trappings of fear and despair, and then, after all this, can publically present his findings in a similarly respectable and objective fashion, then he is servicing his research arena admirably. Sadly, in their understandable desperation to ‘wake people up,’ too many researchers resort to shock tactics and fearmongering, which allure impressionable followers into similarly dense vibratory states and also reinforce the tiresome stereotype of the ‘paranoid, hysterical conspiracy theorist,’ which can stagnate the credibility of the entire movement.

Do you view your knowledge of the conspiracy as a burden that continues to weigh upon your subconscious and dispirit your motivation and hope, or as a liberator that ensures that your life choices are informed by insight and context? If you present your research publically, do you ensure that your revelations are delivered with optimism and anchored by viable resolutions, or do you simply report the problems in a manner comparable to newspapers? True, you are not responsible for the reactions of others, but spreading awareness through fear and anxiety is unlikely to reflect well upon the research collective, and thus a consensual reality already influenced by persistent disharmony.

Pragmatic researchers such as Alex Jones probably mean well, but their approaches naturally culminate in dead ends. Having initially outlined the conspiracy with admirable insight and articulacy, they scour the news looking for reports that confirm, yet again, that which they and their listeners already know to be true. As the global police state advances forward with ever increasing blatancy, the reports become more and more despairing, and the listeners’ thoughts become more and more unhopeful. Such thought patterns greatly assist the controllers.

By comparison, those who embrace spiritual knowledge seem more inclined to confront the ever-quickening implementation of fascism with greater motivation, hope and understanding than those who omit metaphysics from the conspiratorial equation. Many hardcore conspiriologists – that is, those committed to material discoveries – seem to incorrectly believe that ‘meta-conspiriologists’ are slackened by demotivating beliefs in benevolent extraterrestrial saviours or messianic figures who will arrive and magic the oppressors away, or by other airy theories that delegate our responsibilities to external sources. Yet, based on my experience, it is mainly those who focus solely on material research who evaluate our situation with pessimism and conclude that ‘we’re too far gone to escape now.’

In my opinion, our research arena should ideally wield a balanced emphasis on spirituality and conspiracy. The latter grounds the former, and the former contextualises the latter. Even if the conspiracy were not metaphysical in nature, its existence is governed by cosmic law. I recommend we consider all possibilities (so that our realities do not filter potential clues) and resist negative emotional investment in all we learn. This is easier said than done, but optimism is a fruit borne of patient cultivation, and once it grows on the tree, it rarely falls and meets its shadow.